From carstairs.mckraken@o... Wed Jul 11 15:23:09 2001
Return-Path: <carstairs.mckraken@o...>
X-Sender: carstairs.mckraken@o...
X-Apparently-To: uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 11 Jul 2001 22:23:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 18984 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 22:23:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 11 Jul 2001 22:23:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ci.egroups.com) (10.1.2.81) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jul 2001 22:23:04 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: carstairs.mckraken@o...
Received: from [10.1.10.125] by ci.egroups.com with NNFMP; 11 Jul 2001 22:23:04 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 22:23:03 -0000
To: uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Friday 13th
Message-ID: <9iijk7+mil8@e...>
In-Reply-To: <a3bpktkd61r0b16309s8vvvrjl6p8jt15h@4...>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 819
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 194.164.6.143
From: "Caruthers Carstairs McKraken" <carstairs.mckraken@o...>

--- In uklocaltrolls@y..., bigfish@s... wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:57:12 -0000, snooker@i... wrote :
>
> >As the dudes are expecting something - there little point doing it
> >IMHO .
> >
> >Perhaps its time to end it , Agree/disagree ? .
> >
> I'd support a postponement on the grounds that they are starting to
argue
> amongst themselves discussing the trolls and what to do about it.
> That's a good outcome for the time being, whereas resuming the same
activity
> will probably reunite them again.

I agree with postponing at least as regards uly. The last thing we
want is for all the ulygans to piss off to an egroup. uly will still
be there for another day.

How about doing a different group eg london or southwest. But not
birmingham, I think me and Pinky Poo nearly killed it.

(my views only)
CCM