From snooker@i... Sun Jul 08 13:29:58 2001
Return-Path: <snooker@i...>
X-Sender: snooker@i...
X-Apparently-To: uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 8 Jul 2001 20:29:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 69542 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2001 20:29:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Jul 2001 20:29:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cj.egroups.com) (10.1.2.82) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2001 20:29:57 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: snooker@i...
Received: from [10.1.10.106] by cj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 Jul 2001 20:29:57 -0000
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 20:29:55 -0000
To: uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Hello
Message-ID: <9iafs3+u170@e...>
In-Reply-To: <9iafaj+335n@e...>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 672
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 212.126.143.199
From: snooker@i...

Welcome .

The uly newsgroup is being used as a testing ground - in order to
learn the effects of this new type of troll .

When the time comes , We will move to another newsgroup & apply the
techniques that we have all learnt .

Its reckoned it will take several newsgroups - to perfect the method .



(each bunch of users - will react a little differently IMHO) .




--- In uklocaltrolls@y..., carstairsmckraken@h... wrote:
> Evening all, cheers for approving my application to join ult :-)
I'm really enjoying trolling ULY - are there any plans to step up or
change the trolling? Not that there really needs to be - it seems to
be winding them up pretty well as it is