|
|
From bigfish@s... Mon Jun 25 00:34:25 2001
Return-Path: <bigfish@s...>
X-Sender: bigfish@s...
X-Apparently-To: uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 25 Jun 2001 07:34:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 45587 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2001 07:34:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 25 Jun 2001 07:34:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zetnet.co.uk) (194.247.47.48) by mta1 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2001 07:34:24 -0000
Received: from man-a099.dialup.zetnet.co.uk (man-a099.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.44.99]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3/Debian 8.11.2-1) with ESMTP id f5P7YMw04414 for <uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:34:22 +0100
To: uklocaltrolls@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [uklocaltrolls] uk.local.essx
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:30:15 +0200
Organization: .
Message-ID: <5hmdjt0sfledc8knh1tu28f7eue64g4266@4...>
References: <F110fkQUrz3ffonNWeH00013e57@h...>
In-Reply-To: <F110fkQUrz3ffonNWeH00013e57@h...>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: bigfish@s...
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:02:31 -0000, Jasper The Drunken Tramp wrote :
>At first I checked out uk.local.essex. I can see why they started a new
>group!
>
They've been all over the place, creating free.uk.talk.essex, then
free.uk.talk.e-s-s-e-x then alt.uk.local.e-s-s-e-x and now finally this one.
Next will be uk.local.sussx and then uk.local.knt
>Since it's a new group, I think the Johns should have a presense at the
>beginning. It could be our duty to keep it free from netcops.
>
agreed !
--
Bigfish
|